<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How does your blog score on PageRank?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogtips.org/how-does-your-blog-score-on-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogtips.org/how-does-your-blog-score-on-pagerank/</link>
	<description>Blogging and Social Media for Nonprofit</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:25:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtips.org/how-does-your-blog-score-on-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtips.org/?p=614#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I have not really paid a lot of attention to Bing. On none of the sites I have been involved in, I can see a significant amount of traffic coming from Bing... So I have not seen it useful to engage in tailoring the SEO of a site specifically for Bing.
The &quot;lazy me&quot;, thinks that &quot;if I do it well for Google, it must work for Bing&quot;... I do submit the sitemaps to Bing, though.. but that is about the only thing specific I do.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I have not really paid a lot of attention to Bing. On none of the sites I have been involved in, I can see a significant amount of traffic coming from Bing&#8230; So I have not seen it useful to engage in tailoring the SEO of a site specifically for Bing.<br />
The &#8220;lazy me&#8221;, thinks that &#8220;if I do it well for Google, it must work for Bing&#8221;&#8230; I do submit the sitemaps to Bing, though.. but that is about the only thing specific I do.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daily news</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtips.org/how-does-your-blog-score-on-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>daily news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 14:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtips.org/?p=614#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>PageRank is probably one of the most important algorithms ever developed for the Web. 
PageRank is not simply based upon the total number of inbound links. 
The basic approach of PageRank is that a document is in fact considered the more important the more other documents link to it, 
but those inbound links do not count equally.
good points here about Trust now being a major factor in search engine results, 
that goes with what Rand and others have been saying too. 
this also settles for me the value of a natural approach to gaining backlinks and not getting a huge bunch of them, 
or a large # of high pr backlinks in a short period of time - it rather undermines the Trust factor.
I do wonder what you think of bing and how Trust does/will play a role in their results. 
it seems to me from a rather preliminary and cursory look at some results and comparing those to over at google and yahoo, 
that bing ofter relies more on the keyword/s being the actual url, 
which seems to me a rather poor way to rank sites/pages.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://dodoshare.blogspot.com/search/label/News&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Latest News&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PageRank is probably one of the most important algorithms ever developed for the Web.<br />
PageRank is not simply based upon the total number of inbound links.<br />
The basic approach of PageRank is that a document is in fact considered the more important the more other documents link to it,<br />
but those inbound links do not count equally.<br />
good points here about Trust now being a major factor in search engine results,<br />
that goes with what Rand and others have been saying too.<br />
this also settles for me the value of a natural approach to gaining backlinks and not getting a huge bunch of them,<br />
or a large # of high pr backlinks in a short period of time &#8211; it rather undermines the Trust factor.<br />
I do wonder what you think of bing and how Trust does/will play a role in their results.<br />
it seems to me from a rather preliminary and cursory look at some results and comparing those to over at google and yahoo,<br />
that bing ofter relies more on the keyword/s being the actual url,<br />
which seems to me a rather poor way to rank sites/pages.<br />
<a href="http://dodoshare.blogspot.com/search/label/News" rel="nofollow">Latest News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renowned Media</title>
		<link>http://www.blogtips.org/how-does-your-blog-score-on-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Renowned Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 23:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogtips.org/?p=614#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an &lt;a href=&quot;http://renownedmedia.com/blog/pagerank-and-higher-search-engine-rankings-explained/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; helping to explain PageRank if anyone is interested in reading more into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an <a href="http://renownedmedia.com/blog/pagerank-and-higher-search-engine-rankings-explained/" rel="nofollow">article</a> helping to explain PageRank if anyone is interested in reading more into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

